<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lots of Happy Birthdays</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fredericiana.com/2009/11/09/lots-of-happy-birthdays/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fredericiana.com/2009/11/09/lots-of-happy-birthdays/</link>
	<description>Open Source, The Web, And German-American Oddities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:43:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://fredericiana.com/2009/11/09/lots-of-happy-birthdays/comment-page-1/#comment-240473</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredericiana.com/?p=2453#comment-240473</guid>
		<description>Anonymous: You are right, though Firefox 1.0 was the first version considered &quot;stable&quot;, and it therefore can be considered the &quot;birth&quot; of Firefox as a product.

Jeff: Yes, while Firefox&#039;s significance for the political landscape in central Europe as well as its educational influence on multiple generations of children all over the world has yet to be assessed by independent research, I am leaning towards agreeing with you on this one, and deciding on Firefox being, indeed, the &quot;least&quot; in this context :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous: You are right, though Firefox 1.0 was the first version considered &#8220;stable&#8221;, and it therefore can be considered the &#8220;birth&#8221; of Firefox as a product.</p>
<p>Jeff: Yes, while Firefox&#8217;s significance for the political landscape in central Europe as well as its educational influence on multiple generations of children all over the world has yet to be assessed by independent research, I am leaning towards agreeing with you on this one, and deciding on Firefox being, indeed, the &#8220;least&#8221; in this context <img src='http://fredericiana.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Walden</title>
		<link>http://fredericiana.com/2009/11/09/lots-of-happy-birthdays/comment-page-1/#comment-240450</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Walden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredericiana.com/?p=2453#comment-240450</guid>
		<description>Notwithstanding that I&#039;m sure it was meant (and is generally used) simply as a turn of phrase, not to be taken literally, of these anniversaries I absolutely would put Firefox as &quot;least&quot;.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notwithstanding that I&#8217;m sure it was meant (and is generally used) simply as a turn of phrase, not to be taken literally, of these anniversaries I absolutely would put Firefox as &#8220;least&#8221;.  <img src='http://fredericiana.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://fredericiana.com/2009/11/09/lots-of-happy-birthdays/comment-page-1/#comment-240448</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredericiana.com/?p=2453#comment-240448</guid>
		<description>Odd to count Firefox 1.0 as the birthday of Firefox.  I certainly used Firefox well before 1.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Odd to count Firefox 1.0 as the birthday of Firefox.  I certainly used Firefox well before 1.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
