<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s &#8220;Absolutely Outdated&#8221; Biometric Employee Monitor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fredericiana.com/2008/01/18/microsofts-absolutely-outdated-biometric-employee-monitor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fredericiana.com/2008/01/18/microsofts-absolutely-outdated-biometric-employee-monitor/</link>
	<description>Open Source, The Web, And German-American Oddities</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pf</title>
		<link>http://fredericiana.com/2008/01/18/microsofts-absolutely-outdated-biometric-employee-monitor/#comment-161630</link>
		<dc:creator>pf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredericiana.com/2008/01/18/microsofts-absolutely-outdated-biometric-employee-monitor/#comment-161630</guid>
		<description>If you can monitor employees can you also use the sensors to control them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can monitor employees can you also use the sensors to control them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://fredericiana.com/2008/01/18/microsofts-absolutely-outdated-biometric-employee-monitor/#comment-109868</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredericiana.com/2008/01/18/microsofts-absolutely-outdated-biometric-employee-monitor/#comment-109868</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the comment and link, Vanst. I do agree that monitoring body functions may prove useful for UI labs and such; however, my comment is not about being a "usual anti-Microsoft scare monger", as you suggest, instead monitoring employees is specifically mentioned as claim no. 20 in the patent application document.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the comment and link, Vanst. I do agree that monitoring body functions may prove useful for UI labs and such; however, my comment is not about being a &#8220;usual anti-Microsoft scare monger&#8221;, as you suggest, instead monitoring employees is specifically mentioned as claim no. 20 in the patent application document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanst</title>
		<link>http://fredericiana.com/2008/01/18/microsofts-absolutely-outdated-biometric-employee-monitor/#comment-109808</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fredericiana.com/2008/01/18/microsofts-absolutely-outdated-biometric-employee-monitor/#comment-109808</guid>
		<description>Way to completely miss the point of the software which is to detect user frustration with user interfaces, it's purpose is for focus groups and UI development but of course the media and the usual anti-Microsoft scare mongers go into spin mode &#38; turn it into something else.

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080103-microsoft-patents-frustration-detecting-help-system.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to completely miss the point of the software which is to detect user frustration with user interfaces, it&#8217;s purpose is for focus groups and UI development but of course the media and the usual anti-Microsoft scare mongers go into spin mode &amp; turn it into something else.</p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080103-microsoft-patents-frustration-detecting-help-system.html" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080103-microsoft-patents-frustration-detecting-help-system.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
